India and Russia Arms
In 1947, India’s military was 100% Western made. By 2022, Moscow had become India’s top defence supplier.. We’ve heard a lot about India’s dependence on ๐ท๐บ weapons. But how did India pivot from an entirely Western-made military to a ๐ท๐บ made one?
Top diplomat YD Gundevia recounted that in 1962 India’s military was largely British made. The Air Force was crewed by UK-made Hunters, Gnats & Canberra bombers. The Army and Navy were also largely Western made. INS Vikrant, India’s first aircraft carrier, was bought from Britain.
But there were problems with Western defence sales to ๐ฎ๐ณ. First, the West was actively arming Pakistan, which had signed a military partnership agreement with the US in 1954. While India warned that ๐ต๐ฐ would use these weapons against ๐ฎ๐ณ, the West denied this. This caused tensions.
While Pakistan received a flood of Western weapons on favourable terms, ๐ฎ๐ณ felt short-changed by the West “We were forced into buying arms, gun for gun and aircraft for aircraft, in hard cash, at the cost of everything, else in our low-powered economy,” Gundevia said.
These tensions were because of India’s larger non-aligned foreign policy. America’s President Eisenhower & his top diplomats took a “with us or against us” approach to diplomacy. Because ๐ฎ๐ณ has not explicitly aligned with ๐บ๐ธ in the Cold War, defence ties were strained.
Western defence supplies could also be unreliable. A key example was Britain’s Canberra bombers, which ๐ฎ๐ณ bought in 1957. More than halfway through the deal, Britain told ๐ฎ๐ณ that it could not sell it bombs to go with the Canberras since they were on a NATO Secret List. ๐ฎ๐ณ threatened to cancel the deal, after which the UK informed Delhi that the bombs were, miraculously, no longer on the secret list. From aircraft to submarines, Western powers were increasingly unwilling to sell ๐ฎ๐ณ equipment in the 1950s and 60s. That’s where the Soviets came in.
Gundevia, later India’s Foreign Secretary, recounts that ๐ฎ๐ณ wasn’t sure about the Soviets. “Nehru or no Nehru, the bureaucracy in New Delhi was suspicious of the Russians. Less than half a dozen of us had by then gone anywhere near Moscow,” he said of India in the 1950s.
Until 1962, India had bought no weapons from the Soviet Union. But then, the 1962 war between India and China took place, where ๐ฎ๐ณ suffered serious setbacks. The West, on which ๐ฎ๐ณ was dependent for weapons, provided a limited amount of support. But that was unlikely to continue.
“The ๐บ๐ธ Ambassador was, in 1963, making it clear to us, categorically, that we should not ever hope to get enough war material from them to throw the Chinese aggressors out of Aksai Chin, in the north- east. At best, we were clearly told, we might hope for just enough help to defend ourselves a little better, in case of any repetition of Chinese incursions of the kind we had suffered the year before,” remembers Gundevia. That was when ๐ฎ๐ณ began reaching out to the Soviets for arms.The Soviets, unlike the West, did not make political demands.
An example: after the defeat in the 1962 war, ๐ฎ๐ณ wanted to improve connectivity to Ladakh in case ๐จ๐ณ tried to fight another war. So, it asked to purchase America’s C-130 transport aircraft. Despite selling these planes to Pakistan, ๐บ๐ธ was unwilling to sell to ๐ฎ๐ณ. US Ambassador John Galbraith told the Indians that the planes were too expensive for ๐ฎ๐ณ & hummed & hawed about a sale. Left with no choice, India bought the Soviet-made AN-12s. ๐บ๐ธ also lectured ๐ฎ๐ณ about costs when it tried to buy the F104 supersonic fighter but sold it to ๐ต๐ฐ.
So, Gundevia says, India went out and bought the Soviet MiG21. When ๐ฎ๐ณ wanted submarines, Britain asked ๐ฎ๐ณ to wait for 3 years & offered to sell obsolete designs. Gundevia recalls that the Soviets didn’t lecture ๐ฎ๐ณ & offered more subs than India requested. The Soviets didn’t ask India for political support while the West always pushed for ๐ฎ๐ณ’s backing in the Cold War. Gundevia recalls travelling to Yugoslavia as Secretary to Prez Radhakrishnan in 1965. India had just fought the ‘65 war with ๐ต๐ฐ& ๐บ๐ธ had imposed an arms embargo on ๐ฎ๐ณ.
During the war, India’s supply of British-made Centurion tanks had declined. Cut off from Western arms supplies, ๐ฎ๐ณ requested T-54 tanks from Yugoslavia. During the visit, Gundevia made the request to the country’s Defence Minister. The Minister responded: “You want T 54 tanks? There are none on our assembly lines, just now. But we will pick them up from the fields, Mr. Secretary, and send them to you as fast as we can.” The Indians, Gundevia recalls, were floored at the offer after dealing with the West.
“A gesture like this, behaviour like this, conduct like this makes a big difference, inevitably,” he said. Soviet flexibility on terms and its unwillingness to push ๐ฎ๐ณ to take sides built trust. India’s army predominantly uses Russian tanks, to this day.
The story, pulled largely from Gundevia’s memoirs, illustrates that India’s defence dependence on ๐ท๐บ wasn’t really part of a tilt towards USSR. The West’s flaky behaviour, its backing of Pakistan and its unwillingness to sell ๐ฎ๐ณ the equipment it needed pushed Delhi to the Soviets.